بحث عن كتاب
تحميل و قراءة كتاب APPLIED LINGUISTICS WHAT S THAT NUMA MARKEE pdf

تحميل كتاب APPLIED LINGUISTICS WHAT S THAT NUMA MARKEE pdf

تحميل و قراءة كتاب APPLIED LINGUISTICS WHAT S THAT NUMA MARKEE pdf
المؤلف : Numa Markee
التصنيف : كتب منوعة
سنة النشر : 1990
عدد الصفحات : غير محدد
عن الكتاب : 1990م - 1443هـ APPLIED LINGUISTICS: WHAT’S THAT? NUMA MARKEE Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States of America This paper traces the historical development of strong and weak definitions of applied linguistics. Strong definitions of applied linguistics assume that the methods and insights of theoretical linguistics are directly applicable to resolving second language teaching problems. On the other hand, weak definitions do not limit themselves to the resolution of second language teaching problems but potentially address all practical language-related problems. These definitions typically assert the autonomy of the field from the mother discipline; and they draw on a broad range of feeder disciplines in addition to theoretical linguistics, whose choice depends on which particular language-related problem is to be resolved. This paper argues that weak definitions are preferable in that they provide a most necessary element of flexibility in the theory and practice of applied linguistics which is in tune with the needs and realities of the wider profession. Finally, the paper illustrates these theoretical principles with a practical example by examining the contributions various feeder disciplines can make to designing a coherent second language curriculum. INTRODUCTION Applied linguistics (AL) is barely 40 years old. Howatt (1984) cites the first issue of Language Learning (1948), subtitled A Quarterly Journal of Applied Linguistics, as the first use of this term. Whether this is actually its first attestation or not is less important than the fact that it had gained common acceptance by the mid 1950s in both the United States and Britain as the name for our profession. Other labels, such as educational linguistics (Spolsky, 1978), have been suggested, but these alternatives have not diffused to any great extent among the wider profession. For good or for ill, AL is the most widely used term; therefore, this is the expression that will be used in the rest of this paper. Given that AL has had such a short history as a recognizably separate academic discipline, it is not surprising that applied linguists differ as to what the defining characteristics of the field are. Is it synonymous with language teaching, in particular English language teaching or with second language acquisition (SLA)? Furthermore, what is its relationship to theoretical linguistics? Is it no more than the sum of its parts, that is, the application of linguistic theory to language teaching, or is it an autonomous discipline which is also concerned with problems that are not necessarily confined to issues related to formal language instruction? .
وصف كتاب APPLIED LINGUISTICS WHAT S THAT NUMA MARKEE
1990م - 1443هـ APPLIED LINGUISTICS: WHAT’S THAT? NUMA MARKEE Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States of America This paper traces the historical development of strong and weak definitions of applied linguistics. Strong definitions of applied linguistics assume that the methods and insights of theoretical linguistics are directly applicable to resolving second language teaching problems. On the other hand, weak definitions do not limit themselves to the resolution of second language teaching problems but potentially address all practical language-related problems. These definitions typically assert the autonomy of the field from the mother discipline; and they draw on a broad range of feeder disciplines in addition to theoretical linguistics, whose choice depends on which particular language-related problem is to be resolved. This paper argues that weak definitions are preferable in that they provide a most necessary element of flexibility in the theory and practice of applied linguistics which is in tune with the needs and realities of the wider profession. Finally, the paper illustrates these theoretical principles with a practical example by examining the contributions various feeder disciplines can make to designing a coherent second language curriculum. INTRODUCTION Applied linguistics (AL) is barely 40 years old. Howatt (1984) cites the first issue of Language Learning (1948), subtitled A Quarterly Journal of Applied Linguistics, as the first use of this term. Whether this is actually its first attestation or not is less important than the fact that it had gained common acceptance by the mid 1950s in both the United States and Britain as the name for our profession. Other labels, such as educational linguistics (Spolsky, 1978), have been suggested, but these alternatives have not diffused to any great extent among the wider profession. For good or for ill, AL is the most widely used term; therefore, this is the expression that will be used in the rest of this paper. Given that AL has had such a short history as a recognizably separate academic discipline, it is not surprising that applied linguists differ as to what the defining characteristics of the field are. Is it synonymous with language teaching, in particular English language teaching or with second language acquisition (SLA)? Furthermore, what is its relationship to theoretical linguistics? Is it no more than the sum of its parts, that is, the application of linguistic theory to language teaching, or is it an autonomous discipline which is also concerned with problems that are not necessarily confined to issues related to formal language instruction? .
تحميل
التحميل حجم الكتاب
غير محدد فى الوقت الحالى
أضافة مراجعة
0.0 / 5
تقييم

APPLIED LINGUISTICS WHAT S THAT NUMA MARKEE

بناء على 0 مراجعة
1 (0)
2 (0)
3 (0)
4 (0)
5 (0)